Next Show: ...loading...

Sunday Weekly Review

March 20, 2005

(broadcast stream) (.wma download (no .mp3 today))

The Case of Terry Schiavo
Steroids in Baseball
Wolfowitz at the World Bank
Explaining the Bush administration in Three Letters: O I L
—– 1) Is Permanently Destroying the Last American Wilderness Worth Six Months of Oil?
(Of course! After all, if it’s worth the lives of 1500 Americans, 10,000 wounded, and 100,000 Iraqis…..)
—– 2) Why the Saudis Raised Oil Prices After the Election
(I told you they would before the election)
—– 3) Anyone Remember Jimmy Carter?
(Imagine how history would be different if Republicans had embraced alternative energy sources in the 1970’s.)
Why the Majority of Bush Supporters Prefer Ignorance over Truth
(If you haven’t read this fascinating poll, you should.)
And anything else you want to bring up…

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

  • fran March 27, 2005 9:09 pm

    does anyone believe that maybe terri does not want to live in the state she is in and all the religious fanatics dont seem to understand that to let her rest in peace and quit grandstanding because they want to have their face on camera. dosent their faith let this person die with dignity

  • cornhoolio March 23, 2005 5:52 pm

    Newsweek’s esteemed commentator Frareed Zakaria believes Wolfie is about to get reeducated regarding right wing stereotypes. Check it out over at

  • puzzled March 23, 2005 12:42 pm

    Some facts for us ponder:
    We have a very corrupt government in place – yes.
    They are attempting any stunt they can to benefit their very rich insiders – yes?
    They use about any ploy they can come up with to keep the people unaware or misinformed – yes?
    They have effectively muzzled all of main stream media where we here nothing of such things as election fraud or related news that they deem irrelevant – yes?
    Mark & RadioInsideScoop say; ‘bring you the news that many in our government don’t want you to hear’ – yes?
    We have on our blog 1 – 2 perhaps 3 real people, posting as many, and having as their purpose routing this program in any direction other then government corruption – yes?
    Do we hear them voicing any concerns at all about what is going on in our government today – No?
    And so we ponder all this.
    What do we make of Armstrong Willams, and others of his ilk being funded with tax dollars?
    How do the Neo-Cons hope to get away with robbing us blind?
    ******* If anyone can put this puzzle together and make some sense of it I hope they will let me know.
    Oh, and yes, welcome back Tracie.

  • Tracie March 23, 2005 10:53 am

    Dave —- this is for you – hope it makes you happy and that you feel you actually accomplished something. You are the biggest reason I left this blog —- I personally don’t know how Vicky or some of the others here can stomach you; you are a mean vindictive man and you are also very paranoid not only about the government but about people in general. Let it be known that wherever I posted in my name that it was and is me, Tracie, that “rich republican” you accused of wearing furs etc etc ad nauseum. I told Vicky I wouldn’t waste any more time here but that’s her choice…and no, we don’t know one another personally – we’ve exchanged emails after hooking up here on this blog. And no, I don’t post a legit email because people like you take advantage of that to harrass others.
    I keep in touch and was thrilled to learn that Randy Alcorn is Mark’s guest today on the Abortion issue. We’ve not been listening to much of Radio Inside Scoop at work lately although we did catch the Domestic Violence show which was excellent and will listen today.
    Now, I’ve got to get back to work. Have a great day Dave.

  • Mark Levine March 23, 2005 9:54 am

    I’ve never known Vicky to post under a false email address. There was a time once a couple months ago where one person falsely used HER email address. But Vicky called him on it and that person stopped posting.
    Feel free to complain about JohnnyP’s offensive posts, but please don’t blame Vicky for them.