Next Show: ...loading...

The Iowa Caucus

January 8, 2008

Video / Audio

Mark debates Republican Mike Lane on the results.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

  • Robt January 6, 2008 7:28 pm

    A true press conference just recently in Iowa…
    Huckabee in Iowa answering questions at a press gig;
    Huck took much of the time to complain about Romney’s attacks on himself, McCain and Rudy’s records. “He is dishonest” Huck said of Romney.
    Press asked- Why not take out ads at Romney to clear this?
    Huck- I’m not going to take out ads everytime Romney makes accusations.
    Press- Then why all this now with us?
    Huck- I don’t want anyone left to think when Romney makes things up about me, it is true. I want to make sure people know I addressed his
    (Romney’s) dishonesty attack ads at me.
    Press- So you say Romney is dishonest?
    Huck – Yes he is dishonest.
    Press- You have also stated that if someone is misleading in their application(s) to get a job that this person could never be trustworthy.
    Huck- Yes, if one is not completely truthful in applying for a position, how could they be honest in their employment from thereon.
    Press- If Romney won the Republican Presidential nomination, would you vote for him in the General election for President?
    Huck- I would never vote for a Democratic President !!
    Press- Never?
    Huck- Absolutely, Never !
    Press- So if Romney gets the nomination you would vote for a (in your words) a Dishonest Republican Mitt Romney instead of an honest
    Democratic President.?
    Huck- Your good. And I’m not good enough to answer that..and I will not answer that!
    Would mike vote for a dishonest Republican or an honest Democratis candidate?

  • Robt January 6, 2008 7:26 pm

    Tell Mike I am telling you what is resonating in Red state Nebraska. Nebraska Republicans (except the Bush 28 percenters.

  • Robt January 6, 2008 7:24 pm

    I would like to know what Mike (your favorite republican) think on the aspect that John Edwards speaks pretty clear on addressing Corporate excesses vs Obama that does generally calls for change?
    On Gov’t providing what we want it to, Not just what Mike and Friedman says it should.
    Gov’t should protect the citizens from China lead tainted product or toothpaste with anti freeze in it.
    Just like Gov’t protects every business in all foreign affairs overseas.
    Oil company interests have always been backed by the protection of the US Gov’t and I challenge you to explain that any US Business would be able to survive and thrive in foriegn countries.

  • Robt January 6, 2008 7:08 pm

    Do you have anyone answering your phone?